www.sethgodin.com
I like to share what this man knows.
Friday, December 17, 2010
Monday, October 25, 2010
No escape.
We traveled recently through three states. Just as we escaped one race we were assailed with another...
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=130674155&sc=nl&cc=ph-20101024
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=130674155&sc=nl&cc=ph-20101024
Monday, October 4, 2010
Blog on blog: Sustainable Enterprise video on You Tube
Blog on blog: Sustainable Enterprise video on You Tube
http://sustainableenterpriseconference.com/content/701/2010-conference-highlights
http://sustainableenterpriseconference.com/content/701/2010-conference-highlights
Sustainable Enterprise video on You Tube
http://sustainableenterpriseconference.com/content/701/2010-conference-highlights
Check it out!
Check it out!
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
Body Armour: What have you got your marketing 'wrapped' around?
Under Armour became the coveted brand for young men in their teens and 20s. Now the company is aiming to win over active young women.
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Look at Lookville
A creative and fresh spin on "what should I wear today." Careful what you ask for... but I can see an application! I also compliment the site, and Adeline in particular, for sending me a personal email recognizing my De-construct Blog. Either someone really read it or there's new technology out there that 'hooked us up." The foundation of Sales and Marketing will always be the a personal touch. I owed them a "Look". See for yourself. www.lookville.com :-)
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
Response to Seth Godin's blog today
My comments follow Seth's: I wholly disagree!
On Aug 11, 2010, at 3:46 AM, Seth Godin wrote:
When technology and tradition diverge
What be the effect on voting patterns if we used digital technology to announce the current vote tally every hour (or every hundred votes).
People would see the direction an election was going and be more likely to be pulled in. Voter attention and ultimately voter involvement would go up, and fraud would be more difficult.
So why don't we do it?
When the secret ballot was introduced, it just wasn't possible to count the votes in less than a few days. So a tradition was established, driven by the technology, not because it was the best way. Now, of course, the technology doesn't need that tradition any longer, but it's still here.
One by one, traditions that supported technology are falling as the technology changes. The simple thank you note, for example, is a long tradition based on the technology of couriers and then the postal service. Of course it arrives three days later, because that's how long it takes. At first, the email thank you note seems too impersonal, too easy, too digital. Then, we begin to appreciate the speed and it become ubiquitous and then expected.
There are huge opportunities for marketers seeking to upend traditions that have outlived their usefulness. Just don't expect it to happen overnight.
My comment to Seth's blog- As an ardent follower of your daily blogs on this one, 'When technology and tradition diverge', I have to disagree. The television networks as our traditional source of election results, purposely and lawfully do not reveal actual election results until the ballots have been cast and counted. Granted they bide by polls based on third party tabulations, but the individual vote and the information needed to insure a mostly unbiased electoral vote remains an integral part of our democratic system. As to the thank you note I wholly disagree. If someone has taken the time to share an experience with me professionally or personal by way of any gift, be it a meal or real token,or even time, certainly proper decorum is shown by a 'quick' email followed by a traditional snail-mail (next day?) personal and hand written, note. We should not write less notes because the technology exists but rather stand out as one who does care and takes the time to recognize a shared experience. Technology will never replace tradition except as a generation perceives it as a loss. The loss is then theirs.
On Aug 11, 2010, at 3:46 AM, Seth Godin wrote:
When technology and tradition diverge
What be the effect on voting patterns if we used digital technology to announce the current vote tally every hour (or every hundred votes).
People would see the direction an election was going and be more likely to be pulled in. Voter attention and ultimately voter involvement would go up, and fraud would be more difficult.
So why don't we do it?
When the secret ballot was introduced, it just wasn't possible to count the votes in less than a few days. So a tradition was established, driven by the technology, not because it was the best way. Now, of course, the technology doesn't need that tradition any longer, but it's still here.
One by one, traditions that supported technology are falling as the technology changes. The simple thank you note, for example, is a long tradition based on the technology of couriers and then the postal service. Of course it arrives three days later, because that's how long it takes. At first, the email thank you note seems too impersonal, too easy, too digital. Then, we begin to appreciate the speed and it become ubiquitous and then expected.
There are huge opportunities for marketers seeking to upend traditions that have outlived their usefulness. Just don't expect it to happen overnight.
My comment to Seth's blog- As an ardent follower of your daily blogs on this one, 'When technology and tradition diverge', I have to disagree. The television networks as our traditional source of election results, purposely and lawfully do not reveal actual election results until the ballots have been cast and counted. Granted they bide by polls based on third party tabulations, but the individual vote and the information needed to insure a mostly unbiased electoral vote remains an integral part of our democratic system. As to the thank you note I wholly disagree. If someone has taken the time to share an experience with me professionally or personal by way of any gift, be it a meal or real token,or even time, certainly proper decorum is shown by a 'quick' email followed by a traditional snail-mail (next day?) personal and hand written, note. We should not write less notes because the technology exists but rather stand out as one who does care and takes the time to recognize a shared experience. Technology will never replace tradition except as a generation perceives it as a loss. The loss is then theirs.
Monday, July 5, 2010
What are the future implications for the success of business to business commerce on Facebook?
I submitted the following for inclusion in a new Facebook beta tester development program.
Facebook has inspired thousands, perhaps millions of opportunities to promote people, place, and products. The really credible question in my opinion is how everyday business will revolutionize the face of Facebook. I know from my own experience that personally I like my friends and family and find FB to be a useful tool in keeping track of each. However, professionally my identity demands a much different ‘face’. Yes, followers are nice, but turning these into customers will require different skills. Creatively I think that Facebook not allowing this separation - pages interact- but the cross pollination is imperfect at best, and this needs critical attention.
FB Ads are too easy to recognize even with I must say, a rather gentle and passive approach. Advertising is tired, but Facebook has the potential to transform the genre. By building on the success of one-to-one relationships. My customer is someone I know. I want to approach these people differently than my familiars. In fact I don’t want crazy cousin Bill on ANYONE’S radar. I understand there are successful ways to manipulate the existing system, but I am calling for the allowance of separate professional identities from personal ones. Most importantly I want this linked to a single email address.
I would be very willing to become a beta tester for business to business applications. I blog, tweet and of course Facebook. I am an administrator for several sites, so I have experience and a multitude of frustrations. I promise to provide honest insight if chosen. Thank you for the opportunity to help make a great product even better. Check me out at: Dani Sheehan-Meyer and B2B Media & Marketing.
Dani
Dani Sheehan-Meyer
dsheehan@sonic.net
danib2b.com
danib2b.blogspot.com
Facebook has inspired thousands, perhaps millions of opportunities to promote people, place, and products. The really credible question in my opinion is how everyday business will revolutionize the face of Facebook. I know from my own experience that personally I like my friends and family and find FB to be a useful tool in keeping track of each. However, professionally my identity demands a much different ‘face’. Yes, followers are nice, but turning these into customers will require different skills. Creatively I think that Facebook not allowing this separation - pages interact- but the cross pollination is imperfect at best, and this needs critical attention.
FB Ads are too easy to recognize even with I must say, a rather gentle and passive approach. Advertising is tired, but Facebook has the potential to transform the genre. By building on the success of one-to-one relationships. My customer is someone I know. I want to approach these people differently than my familiars. In fact I don’t want crazy cousin Bill on ANYONE’S radar. I understand there are successful ways to manipulate the existing system, but I am calling for the allowance of separate professional identities from personal ones. Most importantly I want this linked to a single email address.
I would be very willing to become a beta tester for business to business applications. I blog, tweet and of course Facebook. I am an administrator for several sites, so I have experience and a multitude of frustrations. I promise to provide honest insight if chosen. Thank you for the opportunity to help make a great product even better. Check me out at: Dani Sheehan-Meyer and B2B Media & Marketing.
Dani
Dani Sheehan-Meyer
dsheehan@sonic.net
danib2b.com
danib2b.blogspot.com
Thursday, April 29, 2010
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Sobe using non-traditional advertising. Is this new?
http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid1543292789?bctid=78092000001
Thursday, February 18, 2010
What's inthe ROI from past year's investment?
http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=122665
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Children's Markets get Creative: Take a lesson.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/15/business/media/15kids.html?ref=todayspaper
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
De-constructing your team
De-Construct process
In any organization there are always the social / political structures, being the nature of ourselves as human beings, which conceal / exhibit very individual personalities and experiences. In a process I title De-construction; the goal is to put any and all preconceptions forward. These are neither negative nor positive and can in fact be both. The ideas and passion that any one 'person' brings to the group should be gently considered and not over-analyzed. It is very important however to get a real sense of your 'players'. What do they consider their role to be in your group? How do they feel about past experiences? Where do they think the vision is for the future? Is the 'Brand' secure, positively evolving or in danger? Do you have the infrastructure and support to grow your membership? Do you want to grow your membership? (Doing nothing IS an option!) You can manifest your own terms, but asking the questions first will either change your agenda, or confirm that everyone is right where they should be. This intimate process builds relationships and is a positive team building exercise. These are rhetorical or 'open-ended' questions and everyone should answer them in their own words expressing their true opinions. This process, I believe, then creates an environment of trust. You now have a powerful tool: information. The end game is building on the foundation of success in your organization and to identify and establish goals for the future. You will be more effective if you take the time to first consider the past and respect the experiences of your team.
In any organization there are always the social / political structures, being the nature of ourselves as human beings, which conceal / exhibit very individual personalities and experiences. In a process I title De-construction; the goal is to put any and all preconceptions forward. These are neither negative nor positive and can in fact be both. The ideas and passion that any one 'person' brings to the group should be gently considered and not over-analyzed. It is very important however to get a real sense of your 'players'. What do they consider their role to be in your group? How do they feel about past experiences? Where do they think the vision is for the future? Is the 'Brand' secure, positively evolving or in danger? Do you have the infrastructure and support to grow your membership? Do you want to grow your membership? (Doing nothing IS an option!) You can manifest your own terms, but asking the questions first will either change your agenda, or confirm that everyone is right where they should be. This intimate process builds relationships and is a positive team building exercise. These are rhetorical or 'open-ended' questions and everyone should answer them in their own words expressing their true opinions. This process, I believe, then creates an environment of trust. You now have a powerful tool: information. The end game is building on the foundation of success in your organization and to identify and establish goals for the future. You will be more effective if you take the time to first consider the past and respect the experiences of your team.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)